Consumer mediator for training providers: the legal duty and its link to the CPF
Between the Qualiopi audit, the declaration of activity and the BPF, one obligation regularly slips under the radar of training-provider founders: designating a consumer mediator. It appears in none of the 32 indicators of the National Quality Framework — it comes from consumer law, applies as soon as an individual funds all or part of their training, and directly conditions referencing on EDOF. Here is exactly what it covers, who it concerns, and what changed in 2025.
An obligation rooted in consumer law, not the Qualiopi framework
Since 1 January 2016, any professional selling a good or service to a consumer must guarantee them effective, free access to a mediation scheme if a dispute cannot be resolved amicably. This principle, stemming from ordinance n° 2015-1033 of 20 August 2015 transposing a European directive, is now codified in Articles L. 616-1 and R. 616-1 of the Consumer Code: the professional must communicate the contact details of the mediator(s) it falls under, and display them visibly and legibly on its website, terms and conditions of sale or service, and order forms.
This obligation is entirely independent of Qualiopi certification. A provider fully compliant with the quality framework can still be in breach if it has designated no mediator — the two systems answer different logics: one assesses the quality of pedagogical processes, the other protects the consumer in the event of a contractual dispute.
Who is actually concerned in vocational training
The Consumer Code only covers contracts with consumers: individuals acting for purposes unrelated to their professional activity. Concretely, for a training provider:
- A company or an OPCO funding a course for its employees is not a consumer — the contract is B2B, outside the scope of this obligation.
- An individual who funds their own training out of pocket, or through their CPF with or without a co-payment, is treated as a consumer.
A provider working exclusively B2B could, in theory, be exempt under general consumer law. But in practice, as soon as a provider wants to be referenced on the Mon Compte Formation (EDOF) platform, the Caisse des Dépôts requires proof of an active contract with a consumer mediator, regardless of the provider’s actual funding mix — the CPF account holder is treated as a consumer in that contractual relationship.
What the obligation actually requires
Getting compliant means three distinct actions:
- Sign with an accredited mediator. Only mediators referenced by the Commission for the Evaluation and Control of Consumer Mediation (CECMC) can be designated; their list is published on economie.gouv.fr and on the data.economie.gouv.fr portal. Some mediators are generalists, others specialise in training and consulting professions.
- Display the contact details — name, postal address, mediator’s website address — on your own site, in your terms and conditions, on your agreements and order forms, and ideally in the welcome booklet handed to trainees.
- Inform the consumer at the time of a dispute. If a complaint has not been resolved through the provider’s internal procedure (see indicator 31 of the framework, covering handling complaints and incidents), the provider must direct the trainee to the competent mediator.
A recent change to fix on sites that were already compliant
Until 2025, legal notices also had to link to the European online dispute resolution platform (ODR, or RLL in French). This platform closed permanently on 20 July 2025: providers that had referenced it must remove the link from their website and contractual documents, while keeping the contact details of their national mediator. A small detail, but a site that still points to a platform closed for a year is a sign of outdated legal notices — exactly the kind of oversight an inspector, or an unhappy client, can spot easily.
The direct link to CPF/EDOF referencing
For any provider seeking to make its courses eligible for the CPF via EDOF, the Caisse des Dépôts asks, among the required documents, for proof of a valid contract with a consumer mediator. This check is not purely administrative: the Caisse des Dépôts regularly runs verification campaigns on providers already referenced, in the same vein as the tightened subcontracting checks covered in our article on DREETS inspections. An expired or never-signed mediation contract can be enough to block or suspend a referencing, regardless of the quality of the pedagogical offering.
The penalties at stake
Failing to inform consumers about the competent mediator is a breach sanctioned by an administrative fine, issued by the DGCCRF through its document-based or online checks: up to €3,000 for an individual and €15,000 for a legal entity, under Article L. 641-1 of the Consumer Code. These checks cover both websites and contractual documents sent to trainees — a training agreement that fails to mention the competent mediator is exactly the kind of gap an inspection looks for.
Beyond the financial penalty, the absence of a mediation scheme deprives the provider of a tool that, in practice, defuses a share of disputes before they escalate into legal proceedings or public complaints. A recent study published in Conflict Resolution Quarterly (Kulshrestha, 2026, available on Google Scholar), based on a quantitative analysis of 500 consumer mediation cases, shows that private and online mediation schemes achieve markedly higher resolution and compliance rates than public forums, particularly when the process delivers perceived fairness to both parties. In other words, a well-chosen mediator is not just a regulatory box to tick — it’s a filter that keeps a one-off complaint from turning into a public bad review or a lawsuit.
Setting up your mediator in four steps
- Check the list of CECMC-referenced mediators on economie.gouv.fr and compare two or three options, checking their experience with vocational-training disputes.
- Sign the contract and keep the proof — this is the document requested for any EDOF referencing or renewal.
- Update every document — website legal notices, terms and conditions, agreements and training contracts, welcome booklet — removing any outdated reference to the European ODR platform along the way.
- Train your team (or yourself, in a solo structure) to systematically direct a dissatisfied trainee to the mediator when the internal complaint procedure hasn’t been enough, rather than letting the dispute drag on.
Take action
The Complete Kit Certif (€297, 14-day guarantee) includes up-to-date templates for legal notices, terms and conditions, and complaint procedures, ready to complete with your mediator’s contact details. Starting your activity and want to secure all your mandatory documents from day one? The ebook “Create your training organisation in 30 days” (€67) walks through these administrative obligations step by step — or choose the full pack (€347) that bundles both at a preferential price.
Frequently asked questions
+Does a training provider that only works with companies need to designate a consumer mediator?
The Consumer Code only applies to contracts with consumers, meaning individuals acting outside any professional capacity. A provider that invoices exclusively companies or OPCOs is not subject to this obligation for those contracts. However, as soon as a course is sold to an individual, including through self-funded CPF, the obligation applies — and the Caisse des Dépôts requires proof of it for any provider referenced on EDOF, regardless of its funding mix.
+Do you still need to mention the European ODR platform on your website?
No. The European online dispute resolution platform (ODR/RLL) closed permanently on 20 July 2025. Professionals must remove any link to it from their legal notices, terms and conditions, and contractual documents, while still keeping the obligation to state the contact details of their competent consumer mediator.
+How much does a contract with a consumer mediator cost?
Cost varies by mediator and by the provider's volume of activity: most work on an annual subscription, sometimes topped up with a per-case fee. It's worth comparing several mediators referenced by the CECMC before committing, since the mediation mission itself is strictly framed by the Consumer Code regardless of which provider you choose.
+What is the penalty for not complying with this obligation?
Failing to inform consumers about the competent mediator is punishable by an administrative fine of up to €3,000 for an individual and €15,000 for a legal entity, issued by the DGCCRF (Article L. 641-1 of the Consumer Code). For a CPF-referenced provider, missing proof of a mediator contract can also block or suspend referencing on EDOF.