Administrative8 min read

Unified NPEC schedule published: how to check your CFA's new funding rate from 1 September 2026

A CFA reopening its doors in September is, once again, discovering that the funding of its apprenticeship contracts has shifted under its feet. But 2026 changes the scale of the problem: it is no longer a handful of qualifications whose funding rate gets adjusted — the entire schedule has just been republished in one go. Here is what this new text contains, and above all the method to check, contract by contract, what actually applies to your organisation.

What has just been published

France Compétences has released the unified schedule of apprenticeship funding rates (NPEC) applicable from 1 September 2026, published on 31 August 2026. This document brings together, for the first time in a single file, all the amounts resulting from the branch-level arbitrations carried out since France Compétences’ board resolution of 2 April 2026. Alongside it, Decree No. 2026-832 of 29 August 2026 sets out, in its annex, the fallback values that apply whenever no joint branch committee has set a specific amount for a given qualification.

This republication is not a mere technical update: it settles, qualification by qualification and branch by branch, the outcome of the ±20% modulation corridor and the budget-neutrality rule introduced by the decree of 8 December 2025 — the mechanism we detailed in our article on the 2026 NPEC reform. What was, until this summer, a procedure still under arbitration is now an enforceable amount for any contract signed from 1 September onward.

The scale of the change, in numbers

The unified schedule covers 4,383 qualifications spread across 203 professional branches, i.e. close to 890,000 possible combinations of a qualification and a branch. Compared with the previous version, the movement is massive:

  • 756,680 amounts changed — upward or downward depending on each branch’s arbitration;
  • 522 qualifications added, which now have a determined NPEC rate where they previously had none;
  • 3,708 qualifications removed from the schedule, for which the fallback value from the 29 August decree now applies in the absence of a branch arbitration.

In practice, this means a CFA can no longer assume that the NPEC rate for a qualification it has been preparing for years stays the same from one school year to the next — even where nothing about the programme or the diploma itself has changed.

Which contracts are actually affected

The new schedule is not retroactive. It applies only to apprenticeship contracts concluded from 1 September 2026 onward; a contract signed before that date keeps being funded at the rate in force when it was signed, for its entire duration. This is a point worth checking carefully during a school-year start where signatures are often spread over several weeks: the contract’s signature date — not the training start date — is what fixes the applicable NPEC rate.

For a CFA handling a contract termination followed by a new signature with a different employer, that new contract is treated as a conclusion in its own right: it therefore falls under the schedule in force on its own signature date, which may differ from the one that applied to the original contract.

The method for identifying the NPEC rate that applies to your CFA

With close to 890,000 possible combinations, the point is not to scroll through the file line by line but to methodically cross-reference two references for each contract:

  1. The RNCP code of the qualification being prepared — the diploma or professional title targeted by the contract.
  2. The IDCC code of the collective bargaining agreement that applies to the host company, which determines the relevant professional branch for that contract. Our step-by-step guide to finding a company’s IDCC and OPCO explains how to identify it when the employer does not know it themselves.

Cross-referencing these two codes in the unified schedule gives the applicable amount. Where the employer’s branch has not set a specific amount for the qualification concerned, the rate recommended by France Compétences applies, or failing that, the fallback value set by the decree of 29 August 2026.

The case of removed qualifications

A qualification removed from the schedule is not left without funding: it falls back on the fallback value annexed to the decree. The risk, then, is not an absence of funding, but the gap — sometimes significant — between the amount previously negotiated by the branch and this default value, a gap that needs to be factored into the budget forecast before committing to new intakes.

Pitfalls to avoid at the start of the school year

  • Drawing up a quote or a training agreement based on the old NPEC rate, before checking the amount that actually applies on the real signature date.
  • Confusing the training start date with the contract signature date when working out which schedule applies.
  • Overlooking a change in the employer’s branch from one year to the next (a merger, a change of collective bargaining agreement), which can shift the contract onto a different NPEC rate even for an unchanged qualification.
  • Failing to cross-check the amount invoiced to the OPCO against the official schedule, when the gap between the theoretical NPEC and the amount actually paid must show up in the analytical accounting that every CFA must submit to France Compétences each year.

What a Qualiopi auditor looks at

Tracking this republication falls squarely under indicator 23 on legal and regulatory watch of the National Quality Standard: a CFA must be able to show that it monitors changes in its environment, including financial ones, and draws operational conclusions from them. Documenting the date the unified schedule was checked, the amount used per contract, and the source (the France Compétences schedule or a branch position communicated by the OPCO) is direct, usable evidence for an audit, and it also ties into the budget monitoring expected under the BPF annual report.

If, despite this check, a funding request is still rejected or its amount disputed by the OPCO, the steps to follow are detailed in our article on OPCO funding refusals.

What research says about the administrative burden of this kind of scheme

Checking close to 890,000 combinations to find the right amount before every contract signature is not a trivial constraint for a small organisation. Public administration researchers Donald Moynihan, Pamela Herd and Hope Harvey, in a landmark 2015 article published in the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory titled “Administrative Burden: Learning, Psychological, and Compliance Costs in Citizen-State Interactions,” show that the complexity of the steps needed to access a right or a funding scheme is itself a cost — an “administrative burden” — that weighs more heavily on organisations least equipped to absorb it (see the study). For a small CFA without a dedicated regulatory-watch function, this argues for a written, systematic procedure to check the NPEC rate at every signature, rather than a one-off check left to the pedagogical team’s memory.

2026 back-to-school checklist

  • Has the unified NPEC schedule effective 1 September 2026 been downloaded and checked for each of your active qualifications?
  • For each contract being signed, have you checked the RNCP code / IDCC code pair for the employer before finalising the amount?
  • Is there a written procedure for checking the NPEC rate at every new signature, independent of the team’s memory?
  • Have qualifications removed from the schedule been identified, along with their applicable fallback value?
  • Is the gap between the theoretical NPEC and the amount actually paid by the OPCO tracked in your analytical accounting?
  • Is this regulatory watch documented for indicator 23 ahead of your next Qualiopi audit?

Take action

Tracking a republication of this scale without a safety net puts a CFA’s cash flow at real risk. The Kit Certif Complet (€297, 14-day guarantee) provides the evidence tables and regulatory-watch templates expected for every Qualiopi indicator, including those specific to apprenticeship. If you are still structuring your CFA’s offering, the ebook “Create your training organisation in 30 days” (€67) lays the administrative groundwork from day one, and the full Pack (€347) bundles both resources. Browse all our blog articles to keep up with apprenticeship funding news.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

+Does the new unified NPEC schedule apply to apprenticeship contracts I have already signed?

No. The new amounts only apply to apprenticeship contracts concluded from 1 September 2026 onward. A contract signed before that date keeps being funded at the funding rate in force when it was concluded, even if it continues after 1 September.

+How do I know which NPEC rate applies to a qualification for a given employer?

You need to cross-reference two references: the RNCP code of the qualification being prepared, and the IDCC code of the collective bargaining agreement that applies to the host company, which determines the relevant professional branch. The unified schedule published by France Compétences gives, for each qualification/branch pair, the amount applicable from 1 September 2026.

+What happens if my qualification has been removed from the new schedule?

A qualification removed from the schedule no longer has a specific NPEC rate set by a branch for new contracts. Decree No. 2026-832 of 29 August 2026 sets out, in its annex, a default fallback value that applies whenever no joint branch committee has set a specific amount, so that no contract is left without an identifiable funding rate.

+Can a CFA negotiate its own NPEC rate with its OPCO?

No. The NPEC is set per qualification, based on a recommendation from France Compétences and an arbitration by the relevant professional branch — not per CFA. Two centres preparing the same diploma for the same employer receive, in principle, the same amount, regardless of their actual costs or any individual negotiation with the OPCO.

Read next