Is CACES® Mandatory? CACES®, the Driving Authorisation and the French Labour Code
“Is the CACES® mandatory?” is probably the question most often put to providers training equipment operators — and the precise legal answer often comes as a surprise: no, the CACES® is not, as such, a legal obligation. What is mandatory is something else: adequate training and, for certain equipment, a driving authorisation issued by the employer. Understanding this architecture is essential if you sell operator training without promising the impossible — and if you want to grasp why the CACES® has nonetheless become the de facto standard.
What the French Labour Code actually requires
The regulatory bedrock consists of two articles of the Code du travail (French Labour Code):
- Article R4323-55 reserves the operation of self-propelled mobile work equipment and lifting equipment for workers who have received adequate training, refreshed and updated whenever necessary.
- Article R4323-56 adds that, for certain equipment presenting specific risks, operation is subject to an autorisation de conduite (driving authorisation) issued by the employer.
The order of 2 December 1998 (arrêté) sets the list of equipment requiring that authorisation: tower cranes, mobile cranes, vehicle-mounted loading cranes, ride-on industrial trucks, mobile elevating work platforms (MEWPs) and remote-controlled or ride-on construction machinery. To issue the authorisation, the employer must rely on three elements: a fitness examination by the occupational physician, a check of the operator’s knowledge and skills for safe operation, and knowledge of the sites and instructions to be followed.
The word “CACES®” appears nowhere in these texts. The obligation rests on the employer, not on the certificate.
So why does everyone require the CACES®?
Because the “check of knowledge and skills” required by the order has to be substantiated somehow. That is precisely the role of the CACES® — certificat d’aptitude à la conduite en sécurité (safe-operation certificate): a scheme run by the Assurance maladie – Risques professionnels (the health-insurance occupational-risks branch) with the support of the INRS, broken down into Cnam recommendations by equipment family (R482 for construction machinery, R489 for ride-on forklifts, R486 for MEWPs…).
The CACES® is the means recommended by the health-insurance branch to substantiate that assessment. An employer relying on a valid CACES® holds standardised proof, issued by a third-party assessor, that the knowledge-and-skills check was carried out against a national framework. Without a CACES®, the employer must organise and document that assessment itself — legally possible, but much harder to defend after an accident.
The result: clients, insurers and employers massively require the CACES®, which operates as a quasi-standard of the market. For a training provider the nuance is commercial as much as legal: you are not selling a “mandatory licence”, you are selling the most widely recognised way to secure the driving authorisation.
The stakes behind these texts are anything but theoretical. A study by Horberry, Larsson, Johnston and Lambert published in 2004 in Applied Ergonomics (“Forklift safety, traffic engineering and intelligent transport systems: a case study”) evaluated safety interventions around forklifts at two Australian industrial sites and measured a reduction in hazardous interactions between forklifts and pedestrians after human-centred organisational measures were introduced (see the study). Operating machinery is a major occupational risk; formalised operator assessment is one of the levers that reduce it.
Who may issue the CACES®: a non-negotiable point
While the CACES® is not legally required in order to operate, its issuance is strictly regulated: only certified testing bodies may run the tests and sign the certificate. That testing-body certification is granted, recommendation by recommendation, by certification bodies accredited by Cofrac (the French accreditation committee) and under agreement with the health-insurance occupational-risks branch — the full mechanics are described on our page on the certification of CACES® testing bodies.
A training provider therefore faces three possible positions:
- Train only: you deliver the adequate training required by R4323-55, without issuing any CACES®. Legal, but commercially limited.
- Train and have a partner test: a certified testing body runs the tests and issues the certificates, under a transparent contractual arrangement.
- Become a certified testing body yourself: you bring testing in-house — with the investment that entails, notably qualifying your testers and compliant technical facilities.
Selling “training + CACES®” without being in situation 2 or 3 exposes you to client disputes and a risk of misleading advertising — a trap we also cover in our overview of regulated safety training: SST, CACES® and authorisations.
CACES® validity: 5 or 10 years
Each recommendation sets its own validity period for the certificate: 5 years for most equipment families, extended to 10 years for construction machinery under recommendation R482. At expiry the operator retakes the tests — and the employer’s driving authorisation must remain consistent with that validity and with the employee’s actual assignment.
This renewal cycle structures the operator-training market: every certificate issued today is a re-test candidate in 5 or 10 years.
What training providers should remember
- The legal obligation covers adequate training and, for the equipment listed by the order of 2 December 1998, the driving authorisation issued by the employer.
- The CACES® is the recommended standard for substantiating the assessment — not a legal obligation, but a de facto market requirement.
- Only a certified testing body may run the tests and issue the certificate.
- Your sales pitch must be accurate: promising a “legally mandatory CACES®” is wrong; promising its issuance without being a tester, or partnered with one, is risky.
Take action
Building an operator-training offer and want to clarify what you may sell — and under which status? The scheme’s full page, FAQ and related articles are on the certification of CACES® testing bodies page. And to structure your organisation’s quality compliance, explore the framework of the 32 indicators.
Frequently asked questions
+Can you operate a forklift without a CACES®?
Legally, yes — provided the employer has verified the operator's aptitude, ensured adequate training and issued an autorisation de conduite (driving authorisation) for the equipment that requires one. In practice, most employers, clients and insurers demand the CACES®, because it is the means recommended by the French health-insurance branch to substantiate that assessment.
+Who issues the driving authorisation: the training provider or the employer?
Always the employer. The training provider trains and, if it is a certified testing body, runs the tests and issues the CACES®. But the driving authorisation is an act of the employer, taken under its own responsibility, based on medical fitness, the assessment of safe operation and knowledge of the work sites.
+Does the CACES® replace operator training?
No. The CACES® is an assessment: it certifies that the operator has passed the theoretical and practical tests of a recommendation. The adequate training required by article R4323-55 of the French Labour Code is still due whether or not the employee takes the CACES® — the test validates skills, it does not create them.